PDA

View Full Version : Bush's Drug Videos Broke Law


Rob P
01-07-2005, 04:02 AM
January 7, 2005

Bush's Drug Videos Broke Law, Accountability Office Decides
By JOHN FILES

WASHINGTON, Jan. 6 - The Government Accountability Office, an investigative arm of Congress, said on Thursday that the Bush administration violated federal law by producing and distributing television news segments about the effects of drug use among young people.

The accountability office said the videos "constitute covert propaganda" because the government was not identified as the source of the materials, which were distributed by the Office of National Drug Control Policy. They were broadcast by nearly 300 television stations and reached 22 million households, the office said.

The accountability office does not have law enforcement powers, but its decisions on federal spending are usually considered authoritative.

In May the office found that the Bush administration had violated the same law by producing television news segments that portrayed the new Medicare law as a boon to the elderly.

The accountability office was not critical of the content of the video segments from the White House drug office, but found that the format - a made-for-television "story package" - violated the prohibition on using taxpayer money for propaganda.

Representative Henry A. Waxman of California, the senior Democrat on the Government Reform Committee, who requested the review, said the use of the mock news segments broke "a fundamental principle of open government."

A spokesman for the drug policy office said the review's conclusions made a "mountain out of a molehill."

The spokesman, Tom Riley, noted that Congress had authorized the drug policy office to fashion antidrug messages in motion pictures and television programming and on the Internet. His office stopped distributing the antidrug videos after the G.A.O. report on the Medicare segments, Mr. Riley said, and never acted unlawfully.

The drug policy office told investigators that it would have been difficult for "a reasonable broadcaster" to mistake the videos for independent news reports.

But the G.A.O. said the drug policy office "made it impossible for the targeted viewing audience to ascertain that these stories were produced by the government."

Federal law prohibits the use of federal money for "publicity or propaganda purposes" not authorized by Congress. The accountability office has found that federal agencies violated this restriction when they distributed editorials and newspaper articles written by government officials without identifying them.

The accountability office said the administration's misuse of federal money "also constitutes a violation of the Antideficiency Act," which prohibits spending in excess of appropriations.

Copyright 2005*The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | RSS | Help | Back to Top

Humming
01-07-2005, 05:26 AM
Ugh.... thanks for posting that.

Buzz
01-07-2005, 09:42 AM
Remember those commercials right after 9/11 equating drug users with terrorist?
Ariana Huffington and company started running commercials about how if you drive a gas-guzzling SUV you are sponsoring terrorists. What a hoot! The Bush commercials stopped.

Rob, I heard part of the story on this issue on NPR just now. They mentioned "yesterdays ruling" but I missed out on who ruled. Is that the finding Gov't Accountability Office?

Futhermore, since Bush & Company have been found guilty, are there any legal implictions/procedings involved, like maybe impeachment?

daniel
01-07-2005, 11:04 AM
tar and feathering?

or perhaps they should be forced to smoke extract of phalaris grass?

nanouk
01-07-2005, 08:20 PM
:D great idea!

*and a good f***ing up the a*s!

daniel
01-08-2005, 10:33 AM
sorry my attempt at a jest elicited such a sorry response.

Nanouk, please be more considerate with your postings on this board, or I will do what I have not done before and evict you from it.

dragonfly
01-08-2005, 12:19 PM
Here's a link to a PDF copy of the GAO report: http://www.gao.gov/decisions/appro/303495.pdf

nanouk
01-08-2005, 02:56 PM
dear daniel, i appologize if i offended you, i thought you knew me well enough by now, that you would understand i was speaking in metaphor's...

i was hoping we would also share our personalities here on BOTH, as well as quoting books we've read...i turned away from reading the last 15 years, because i spent my first twenty in a traumatized state of mind, and nbooks and knowledge was my saviour, as well as my Mother, my Real Mother, called Earth.

i am a loudmouth sometimes, i admit *humbly*, but i am also one of the most unprejudiced ppl you will ever meet, if we ever meet.

with love and respect,
~N.

silentwolf
01-10-2005, 03:47 PM
Well, as far as the "war on drugs goes," the manual for the aspiring Shaman, which I will entitle "Awaken," should provide some artillery for first amendment usage. It's almost completed, and it will contain cultivation and usage info for the following plants:
t. pachanoi/peruvianus
l. williamsii
p. cubensis
p. viridis
e. major
c. sativa
n. rustica
p. somniferum
s. divinorum
p. harmala
b. caapi
p. arundinacea
d. illinoesis
i. violacea
e. coca/novogranatense
t. iboga
a. nervosa
Along with that is a note that this is by no means a complete listing of all the sacred plants...but they're the only ones I found practical for cultivation at home. It is my hope that this book will help to dash the unconstitutional prohibition against the wall, and help to quell the tide of misinformation on magic due to eons of symbolism and oaths of secrecy.