Rimbaud
04-02-2006, 06:48 PM
Tonight I finished reading "The Mythic Imagination: The Quest For Meaning Through Personal Mythology" by Stephen Larsen. Larsen also wrote "The Shaman's Doorway" and a biography of Joseph Campbell. I've learned a lot from reading the work of Jungian analysts. They seem to understand the spiritual nature of the unconscious although I think they've developed many peculiar ideas which don't mean anything to me.
I picked out a few lines from this book that are meaningful to me; "Consciousness becomes suffused with primary meaning and all perception is numinous" and "The images carry affect and are protean; they metamorphose as one tries to hold them."
However many other Jungian/shaman concepts such as dismemberment, initiation rituals, inner guides, mandalas, etc don't seem to be part of my inner landscape. Somehow I feel that they should entertain different concepts if they found the same things in the depths of the mind as I do.
For me, the depths of the mind is an otherwordly place well beyond the mundane and the adventure of life. Perhaps I should make a better attempt to describe what I consider to be a visionary experience. A visionary experience is like a subtle hallucination of what the psychologists call affect. Larsen describes this as "feeling tone" which is also a good evocative term. The word "numinous" also seems to suggest this altered state of perception. It is as if you saw the world through the eyes of someone else's soul, with an unfamiliar poetry. It is a very curious shift in perception on a very profound and meaningful level. The aesthetic qualities of the world undergoes a slight change and everything becomes eeriely beautiful and extremely haunting, strangely poetic like a dream.
Jungians seem to be somewhat familiar with this experience so they interest me but they are not as interested in waking dreams, haunting experiences, the aesthetic, and mood as they should be.
I picked out a few lines from this book that are meaningful to me; "Consciousness becomes suffused with primary meaning and all perception is numinous" and "The images carry affect and are protean; they metamorphose as one tries to hold them."
However many other Jungian/shaman concepts such as dismemberment, initiation rituals, inner guides, mandalas, etc don't seem to be part of my inner landscape. Somehow I feel that they should entertain different concepts if they found the same things in the depths of the mind as I do.
For me, the depths of the mind is an otherwordly place well beyond the mundane and the adventure of life. Perhaps I should make a better attempt to describe what I consider to be a visionary experience. A visionary experience is like a subtle hallucination of what the psychologists call affect. Larsen describes this as "feeling tone" which is also a good evocative term. The word "numinous" also seems to suggest this altered state of perception. It is as if you saw the world through the eyes of someone else's soul, with an unfamiliar poetry. It is a very curious shift in perception on a very profound and meaningful level. The aesthetic qualities of the world undergoes a slight change and everything becomes eeriely beautiful and extremely haunting, strangely poetic like a dream.
Jungians seem to be somewhat familiar with this experience so they interest me but they are not as interested in waking dreams, haunting experiences, the aesthetic, and mood as they should be.