daniel
03-10-2003, 01:18 AM
Below, I have posted a succint article on Bush's Apocalypse theology. What is strange for me is that, five years ago, I would have agreed entirely with the author that the Book of Apocalypse was apocryphal mumbo-jumbo. My current perspective is in a strange way more in agreement with Bush: This may indeed be the Apocalypse (and the Book of Revelation may have been a more-or-less accurate reading of the Akashic Record). But the Apocalypse is to be followed by the "New Jerusalem," a progression to the next phase (or "higher octave" in Gurdjieff's terms) of human consciousness. As Arguelles puts it, the Apocalyse is about the "end of time," but the end of whose time? He thinks it is the time of the "12:60 frequency" dominator culture.
Recently, I heard Robert Thurman talk about how Bush and Co were frustrated beings - frustrated because they could not evolve. I suspect that one of the essential purposes of modern society is to bring about the biospheric crisis that will force a hyper-accelerated evolution in human consciousness (perhaps by 2012). That evolution is going to require the collapse of the death-culture "dominator" mindset typified by Bush and Co.
So in a sense, one could say they are being forced to bring on this "apocalypse" as the only way to annihilate themselves.
CounterPunch
January 4, 2003
Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory
Bush's Armageddon Obsession, Revisited
by MICHAEL ORTIZ HILL
"We are lived by forces we scarcely understand," wrote W.H. Auden. What
forces live us now as America again torques toward war?
George W. Bush is certainly the plaything of such forces as the geopolitics
of oil but it seems that he is susceptible to other even darker archetypal
concerns. Let me be blunt. The man is delusional and the shape of his
delusion is specifically apocalyptic in belief and intent. That Bush would
attack so many vital systems on so many fronts from foreign policy to the
environment may seem confusing from the point of view of realpolitik but
becomes transparent in terms of the apocalyptic worldview to which he
subscribes. All systems are supposed to go down so the Messiah can come and
Bush, seemingly, has taken on the role of the one who brings this to pass.
The Reverend Billy Graham taught Bush to live in anticipation of the Second
Coming but it was his friendship with Dr. Tony Evans that shaped Bush's
political understanding of how to deport himself in an apocalyptic era. Dr.
Evans, the pastor of a large Dallas church and a founder of the Promise
Keepers movement taught Bush about "how the world should be seen from a
divine viewpoint," according to Dr. Martin Hawkins, Evans assistant pastor.
S.R. Shearer of Antipas Ministries writes, "Most of the leaders of the
Promise Keepers embrace a doctrine of 'end time' (eschatology), known as
'dominionim.' Dominionism pictures the seizure of earthly (temporal) power
by the 'people of God' as the only means through which the world can be
rescued.... It is the eschatology that Bush has imbibed; an eschatology
through which he has gradually (and easily) come to see himself as an agent
of God who has been called by him to 'restore the earth to God's control', a
'chosen vessel', so to speak, to bring in the Restoration of All Things."
Shearer calls this delusion, "Messianic leadership"-- that is to say
usurping the role usually ascribed to the Messiah.
In Bush at War Bob Woodward writes, "Most presidents have high hopes. Some
have grandiose visions of what they will achieve, and he was firmly in that
camp."
"To answer these attacks and rid the world of evil," says Bush. And again,
"We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in
defense of this great nation." Grandiose visions. Woodward comments, "The
president was casting his mission and that of the country in the grand
vision of Gods Master Plan."
In dominionism we can see the theological source of Bush's monomania. Not to
be distracted by the fact that he lost the popular election by a half a
million votes, that the Joint Chief of Staff at the Pentagon were so
concerned about his plans to invade Iraq that they leaked their unanimous
objection, that he has systematically alienated much of the world, that
roughly seventy percent of Americans remain unconvinced of the imminent
threat of Saddam Hussein and the same percentage object to war if there will
be significant American casualties--none of this is in the least relevant.
He believes his mandate toward action is from God.
As humans we live within stories. Some stories, like apocalypse are
thousands of years old. The scriptured text that informs Bush understanding
of and enactment of the End of Days (Revelations 19) depicts Christ
returning as the Heavenly Avenger. Revelations is the only New Testament
book that justifies violence of any kind, and this it takes to the limit:
Christ himself the agent of mass murder.
"I saw heaven open and there before me was a white horse who is called
Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war...He is dressed in a
robe dipped in blood and his name is the word of God...Out of his mouth
comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the Nations. And I saw an
angel standing in the sun who cried in a low voice to all the birds flying
in midair--come gather together for the great supper of God, so you may eat
the flesh of kings, generals and mighty men, of horses and their riders, and
the flesh of all people, free and slave, small and great."
Such is "the glory of the coming of the Lord." Truth, carnage, and the
ecstasy of vultures. In a ruined world the Messiah slays the antichrist and
creates "a new heaven and a new earth." The dead are judged, the Christians
saved and the rest damned to eternal torment. The New Jerusalem is
established and the Lord rules it "with an iron scepter."
It is not inconceivable that Bush is literally and determinedly drawn,
consciously and unconsciously, toward the enactment of such a scenario, as
he believes, for God's sake. Indeed the stark relentlessness of his policy
in the Middle East suggests as much.
It dishonors the profundity of the Christian tradition if one doesn't note
that Revelations has always been a rogue text. Because of its association
with the Montanist heresy (which like contemporary fundamentalists took it
to be literal rather than allegorical) it was with great reluctance that it
was made scripture three centuries after the death of Christ. Traditionally
attributed to St. John, most Biblical scholars now recognize its literary
style and its theology has little in common with John's gospel or his
epistles and was likely written after his death. Martin Luther found the
vindictive God of Revelations incompatible with the gospels and relegated it
to the appendix of his German translation of the New Testament instead of
the body of scripture. All the Protestant reformers except Calvin regarded
apocalyptic millenialism to be heresy.
But Revelations is also a rogue text because it is unmoored from its
origins, which are far from Christian. It is a late variant on a story that
was pervasive in the ancient world: the defeat of the wild and the
uncivilized by a superior order upon which a New World would be established.
Two thousand years before Revelations depicted Christ slaying the antichrist
and laying out the New Jerusalem, Marduk slayed Tiamat and founded Babylon.
This pagan myth recycled as a suspiciously unchristian Biblical test found
new credence in the 19th century when John Darby virtually revived the
Montanist heresy of investing it with a passionate literalism. Given to
visions (he saw the British as one of the ten tribes of Israel) Darby left
the priesthood of the Church of Ireland and preached Revelations as both
prophecy and imminent history. In this he inaugurated a lineage in which
Bush's mentors, the Reverend Billy Graham and Dr. Tony Evans are recent
heirs. Revelations is much beloved by Muslim fundamentalists and like their
Christian compatriots they also thrill to redemption through apocalypse.
Jewish fundamentalists of course do not believe in Revelations but have
nonetheless made common cause with the Christian Right. "It's a very tragic
situation in which Christian fundamentalists, certain groups of them that
focus on Armageddon and the Rapture and the role of a war between Muslims
and Jews in bringing about the Second Coming, are involved in a folie a deux
with extremist Jews," said Ian Lustick, the author of For the Land and the
Lord: Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. The Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition
(and yes it is a single tradition) is being led by its fringe into the abyss
and the rest of us with it.
The world has been readied for the fire but the critical element is the Bush
Administration. Never in the history of Christendom has there been a moment
when this rogue element has carried anything like the credibility and
political power that it carries now.
Michael Ortiz Hill is the author of Dreaming the End of the World (Spring
1994) and, (with Augustine Kandemwa) Gathering in the Names (Spring Journal
books, 2002). The companion to this essay, The Looking Glass War, is posted
at http://www.gatheringin.com/. He can be reached at
michaelortizhill@earthlink.net.
Recently, I heard Robert Thurman talk about how Bush and Co were frustrated beings - frustrated because they could not evolve. I suspect that one of the essential purposes of modern society is to bring about the biospheric crisis that will force a hyper-accelerated evolution in human consciousness (perhaps by 2012). That evolution is going to require the collapse of the death-culture "dominator" mindset typified by Bush and Co.
So in a sense, one could say they are being forced to bring on this "apocalypse" as the only way to annihilate themselves.
CounterPunch
January 4, 2003
Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory
Bush's Armageddon Obsession, Revisited
by MICHAEL ORTIZ HILL
"We are lived by forces we scarcely understand," wrote W.H. Auden. What
forces live us now as America again torques toward war?
George W. Bush is certainly the plaything of such forces as the geopolitics
of oil but it seems that he is susceptible to other even darker archetypal
concerns. Let me be blunt. The man is delusional and the shape of his
delusion is specifically apocalyptic in belief and intent. That Bush would
attack so many vital systems on so many fronts from foreign policy to the
environment may seem confusing from the point of view of realpolitik but
becomes transparent in terms of the apocalyptic worldview to which he
subscribes. All systems are supposed to go down so the Messiah can come and
Bush, seemingly, has taken on the role of the one who brings this to pass.
The Reverend Billy Graham taught Bush to live in anticipation of the Second
Coming but it was his friendship with Dr. Tony Evans that shaped Bush's
political understanding of how to deport himself in an apocalyptic era. Dr.
Evans, the pastor of a large Dallas church and a founder of the Promise
Keepers movement taught Bush about "how the world should be seen from a
divine viewpoint," according to Dr. Martin Hawkins, Evans assistant pastor.
S.R. Shearer of Antipas Ministries writes, "Most of the leaders of the
Promise Keepers embrace a doctrine of 'end time' (eschatology), known as
'dominionim.' Dominionism pictures the seizure of earthly (temporal) power
by the 'people of God' as the only means through which the world can be
rescued.... It is the eschatology that Bush has imbibed; an eschatology
through which he has gradually (and easily) come to see himself as an agent
of God who has been called by him to 'restore the earth to God's control', a
'chosen vessel', so to speak, to bring in the Restoration of All Things."
Shearer calls this delusion, "Messianic leadership"-- that is to say
usurping the role usually ascribed to the Messiah.
In Bush at War Bob Woodward writes, "Most presidents have high hopes. Some
have grandiose visions of what they will achieve, and he was firmly in that
camp."
"To answer these attacks and rid the world of evil," says Bush. And again,
"We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in
defense of this great nation." Grandiose visions. Woodward comments, "The
president was casting his mission and that of the country in the grand
vision of Gods Master Plan."
In dominionism we can see the theological source of Bush's monomania. Not to
be distracted by the fact that he lost the popular election by a half a
million votes, that the Joint Chief of Staff at the Pentagon were so
concerned about his plans to invade Iraq that they leaked their unanimous
objection, that he has systematically alienated much of the world, that
roughly seventy percent of Americans remain unconvinced of the imminent
threat of Saddam Hussein and the same percentage object to war if there will
be significant American casualties--none of this is in the least relevant.
He believes his mandate toward action is from God.
As humans we live within stories. Some stories, like apocalypse are
thousands of years old. The scriptured text that informs Bush understanding
of and enactment of the End of Days (Revelations 19) depicts Christ
returning as the Heavenly Avenger. Revelations is the only New Testament
book that justifies violence of any kind, and this it takes to the limit:
Christ himself the agent of mass murder.
"I saw heaven open and there before me was a white horse who is called
Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war...He is dressed in a
robe dipped in blood and his name is the word of God...Out of his mouth
comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the Nations. And I saw an
angel standing in the sun who cried in a low voice to all the birds flying
in midair--come gather together for the great supper of God, so you may eat
the flesh of kings, generals and mighty men, of horses and their riders, and
the flesh of all people, free and slave, small and great."
Such is "the glory of the coming of the Lord." Truth, carnage, and the
ecstasy of vultures. In a ruined world the Messiah slays the antichrist and
creates "a new heaven and a new earth." The dead are judged, the Christians
saved and the rest damned to eternal torment. The New Jerusalem is
established and the Lord rules it "with an iron scepter."
It is not inconceivable that Bush is literally and determinedly drawn,
consciously and unconsciously, toward the enactment of such a scenario, as
he believes, for God's sake. Indeed the stark relentlessness of his policy
in the Middle East suggests as much.
It dishonors the profundity of the Christian tradition if one doesn't note
that Revelations has always been a rogue text. Because of its association
with the Montanist heresy (which like contemporary fundamentalists took it
to be literal rather than allegorical) it was with great reluctance that it
was made scripture three centuries after the death of Christ. Traditionally
attributed to St. John, most Biblical scholars now recognize its literary
style and its theology has little in common with John's gospel or his
epistles and was likely written after his death. Martin Luther found the
vindictive God of Revelations incompatible with the gospels and relegated it
to the appendix of his German translation of the New Testament instead of
the body of scripture. All the Protestant reformers except Calvin regarded
apocalyptic millenialism to be heresy.
But Revelations is also a rogue text because it is unmoored from its
origins, which are far from Christian. It is a late variant on a story that
was pervasive in the ancient world: the defeat of the wild and the
uncivilized by a superior order upon which a New World would be established.
Two thousand years before Revelations depicted Christ slaying the antichrist
and laying out the New Jerusalem, Marduk slayed Tiamat and founded Babylon.
This pagan myth recycled as a suspiciously unchristian Biblical test found
new credence in the 19th century when John Darby virtually revived the
Montanist heresy of investing it with a passionate literalism. Given to
visions (he saw the British as one of the ten tribes of Israel) Darby left
the priesthood of the Church of Ireland and preached Revelations as both
prophecy and imminent history. In this he inaugurated a lineage in which
Bush's mentors, the Reverend Billy Graham and Dr. Tony Evans are recent
heirs. Revelations is much beloved by Muslim fundamentalists and like their
Christian compatriots they also thrill to redemption through apocalypse.
Jewish fundamentalists of course do not believe in Revelations but have
nonetheless made common cause with the Christian Right. "It's a very tragic
situation in which Christian fundamentalists, certain groups of them that
focus on Armageddon and the Rapture and the role of a war between Muslims
and Jews in bringing about the Second Coming, are involved in a folie a deux
with extremist Jews," said Ian Lustick, the author of For the Land and the
Lord: Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. The Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition
(and yes it is a single tradition) is being led by its fringe into the abyss
and the rest of us with it.
The world has been readied for the fire but the critical element is the Bush
Administration. Never in the history of Christendom has there been a moment
when this rogue element has carried anything like the credibility and
political power that it carries now.
Michael Ortiz Hill is the author of Dreaming the End of the World (Spring
1994) and, (with Augustine Kandemwa) Gathering in the Names (Spring Journal
books, 2002). The companion to this essay, The Looking Glass War, is posted
at http://www.gatheringin.com/. He can be reached at
michaelortizhill@earthlink.net.