PDA

View Full Version : exciting 1968-like developments


daniel
03-16-2006, 06:59 PM
Interesting to see this happening again, but in an ideological vacuum. The students are just trying to hold on to their low social position, rather than acting out of radical inspiration.

and yet... Antonio Negri, etc., wait in the wings...

The New York Times

March 17, 2006
Not '68, but French Youths Hear Similar Cry to Rise Up
By ELAINE SCIOLINO

PARIS, March 16 — Once again, students are on the barricades in France, evoking comparisons to the uprising of May 1968. But this is not a revolt. It is not 1968 revisited.

Certainly, students are taking to the streets and shutting down universities, and tear gas penetrated the heart of Paris.

On Thursday, hundreds of thousands of protesters, most of them students, filled the streets and marched in cities throughout France. With teachers, workers, labor union leaders, the jobless, even retirees beginning to join in, an even larger nationwide protest is planned for Saturday.

And the images of cheering students occupying the 17th-century Sorbonne, the birthplace of the 1968 revolt, last Friday night called forth memories of that exhilarating, romantic leftist youth movement 38 springs ago.

But the students' goal this time is far more modest. They want the abolition of a new law, the First Employment Contract, which aims to increase hiring by allowing employers to fire new workers without cause in their first two years.

"We're not back there in '68," said Nadjet Boubakeur, a 26-year-old history major at a public university here and a leader of the student movement UNEF. "Our revolt is not to get more. It's to keep what we have."

Nonetheless, the demonstrations coincide with a time when the French government seems to be in free fall. In the face of the unrest, President Jacques Chirac and his ministers have been reduced to pleading for dialogue. The government also seemed ineffectual during last fall's riots, and was battered last May when French voters rejected a new constitution for the European Union.

In contrast to the fall riots, which were centered in immigrant-heavy, working-class suburbs, these protests are a mostly middle-class phenomenon that seems to be spreading.

In Paris on Thursday, demonstrators paralyzed traffic for hours as they marched toward government offices. In the upscale Seventh Arrondissement, a small group of masked protesters hurled rocks at anti-riot police officers from a small park in front of the chic Bon Marché department store, just a few blocks from the prime minister's office.

In Rennes, the police used tear gas against youths who had set garbage cans on fire and vandalized cars. In Bordeaux, protesters disrupted rail traffic. In Nancy, youths threw stones at the police, injuring one officer. In Toulouse, the university was closed after clashes between students who wanted it shut and others who wanted it to stay open.

Large protests were also held in Marseille, Montpellier, Lyon, Lille, Clermont-Ferrand, Limoges, Angers, Nantes and Strasbourg.

It is a moment of street theater and fierce debate, with sweeping commentaries about watersheds and crossroads and references to the unrest that shook Paris in May 1968. That was a time of student dreams and of student revolt aimed at transforming an authoritarian, elitist system. It pushed 10 million workers to go on strike in France and came close to forcing de Gaulle from power.

"Sixty-eight was a mass revolutionary movement to create a socialist society," said Henri Weber, now a member of the European Parliament, who was a Communist leader of the 1968 revolt and whose photo protesting in front of the Sorbonne even appeared in Paris Match. "We had an idealistic vision."

The current problem stems from a flawed educational system that churns out young people who lack the necessary skills to get jobs, combined with labor laws that discourage job formation because they require hugely expensive benefits and job-security packages that make it nearly impossible for employers to fire anyone.

The headquarters of UNEF, the student organization, in a gritty section of northeast Paris reflects the disparate nature of the movement. The walls are lined with posters advocating causes like new schools, an end to the war in Iraq, a boycott of McDonald's, a ban on smoking. The air is filled with smoke.

The motto on UNEF fliers protesting the new labor law is hardly a call to action. "Against Precariousness," it reads.

But the students have succeeded in creating an open-ended standoff between the government and a large swath of the people in which both sides seem to be driven by fear.

The government seems to fear its people; the people seem to fear change.

France likes to think of itself as revolutionary. But it is run like a big corporation with a powerful president at the head. Any change in the distribution of power can set off a crisis. Parliament is seen as too weak to serve as a check to that power. Protests are one of the only ways to get the government's attention.

"This is a moment of fear, anxiety and malaise in France that touches all ages and classes," said Anne Muxel, director of the research center at the Paris Institute for Political Studies, better known as Sciences Po. "The students are afraid that they have fewer opportunities than their parents. But their parents are also afraid of unemployment, of the future. The result is that society is politicized, but in a negative way."

According to a survey that will appear Friday in Le Parisien, 68 percent of those French polled want the jobs law to be rescinded; only 27 percent want it to go forward.

On Thursday, as students stepped up their street protests, Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, who has presidential ambitions but whose approval rating has plummeted in recent weeks, called himself "open to dialogue" to "improve" the employment plan under the constraints of the law.

The opposition Socialists have joined forces with those condemning the law, with François Hollande, the party head, dismissing Mr. de Villepin's words as platitudes.

President Chirac is seen as a spent force, even by some in his inner circle.

"The protests are a symptom of a great malaise with no chance for change before the presidential election," said Alain Duhamel, a leading political commentator. "The majority of the French are passionate in their distrust of market forces and in their refusal to embrace flexibility. And the majority of the young are convinced that they will not live as well as their parents."

The students have vowed to continue their struggle until the government backs down.

Those marching voiced a variety of complaints about the new labor law. "This contract is like living beneath a guillotine," said Charlotte Billaud, 21, a political science student in the third year of her five-year program at the Sorbonne. "When you can be fired without reason, you do not dare criticize your boss or join a union."

In addition to members of the largest French unions, professors and retirees took part in the protests. "I teach students so they can have a future, but I am also here for myself," said Jean Albert, 55, a professor of dramatic arts at Nanterre University. "These employment terms are the first breach of the social contract protecting employees."

If there is a historical resonance, it is not with 1968 as much as with 1994, when the prime minister at the time, Édouard Balladur, clashed with students over a minimum wage law.

Then, like now, there were street demonstrations throughout France, tear gas, damage to property, injuries and accusations that the measure was discriminatory.

Politics played a role. Mr. Balladur, like Mr. de Villepin today, had his eyes on the presidency, and he chose to back down on the law. Weakened, he was eliminated in the first round of the 1995 election.

A cartoon of Mr. de Villepin this week in the left-leaning newspaper Libération showed him looking in the mirror and seeing the face of Mr. Balladur.

Thomas Crampton and Maria de la Baume contributed reporting for this article.

Thom
03-16-2006, 10:53 PM
"This contract is like living beneath a guillotine," said Charlotte Billaud, 21, a political science student in the third year of her five-year program at the Sorbonne. "When you can be fired without reason, you do not dare criticize your boss or join a union."

Exactly. Europe seems like a pressure cooker at the moment. Normally placid people are becoming radicalised by the insane manouevres of governments in the pocket of business.

I remember the nationwide demonstrations in Ireland recently, bringing all the major cities to a halt. Dna might be able to tell us more about that.

ID cards in UK are being fiercely debated right now. They were initially approved on the understanding that they would be voluntary. It seems now that 'voluntary' was doublespeak for 'if you want to hold a british passport you need biometric id.' If you don't want to leave the country, then you don't need the id...therefore its voluntary!

Its interesting that many of these laws which curb civil rights are brought in ostensibly to fight terrorism or unemployment etc, but they also hold huge potential for abuse. It seems that governments are in a corner, and forced to propose dangerous laws. I don't believe that Blair and Chirac etc are anything other than desperate and power hungry puppets...of what though? Economic forces? Are we witnessing the sorrowful comedy of human frailty or something stranger and more deeply embedded within the evolution of conciousness?

[ March 16, 2006, 11:55 PM: Message edited by: Thom ]

willoweyes
03-17-2006, 02:19 AM
But the students' goal this time is far more modest. They want the abolition of a new law, the First Employment Contract, which aims to increase hiring by allowing employers to fire new workers without cause in their first two years.

It amazes me how words like these can be printed without even a Bushie-smirk. ". . .aims to increase hiring. . ." how can the NYT let this go by without a caveat?

67 percent of the French population opposes this law . . . so the people take to the streets. In America, the "home of the free" burning an SUV will get you twenty year's hard time, and a place on the FBI's Most Wanted list.

Meantime yearly interest on America's national debt will amount to $200 billion next year. But it's none of your business, my fellow Americans.

ba caracus
03-17-2006, 01:07 PM
Again, further examples of ethically minded actions in Europe I feel.

I dont blame the french, the 'temperary' job ladder is incredibly demoralising. As a student I packed hairbrushes for a month to get cash, becuase each week they promised something greater (packing haridryers perhaps?) which never materialised, and I believed them! I find getting a job in England now an incredibly labourious prospect.

daniel
03-18-2006, 07:50 PM
Thom wrote: "Its interesting that many of these laws which curb civil rights are brought in ostensibly to fight terrorism or unemployment etc, but they also hold huge potential for abuse. It seems that governments are in a corner, and forced to propose dangerous laws."

Yes the question is whether or not these laws (like the Patriot Act) really have much to do with terrorism, and if not, what is the intent behind them, is it conscious or unconscious? And if it is conscious, who is shaping it? The laws seem to me to be geared to Civil Society rather than terrorists, and those who framed them should have awareness of this.

I tend to think that there is a small coterie of super-wealthy right wing figures, most of whom are rarely written about, who have some understanding that the world is about to become extremely chaotic (the reports they condition from foundations and the military-industrial complex lay this out in straightforward terms). They are setting up despotic systems to deal with the imminent social breakdown. I tend to think that for some of these people, a "Final Solution" type scenario is not out of the question. (After all, the Nazis were only 65 yeards ago, and human nature has not changed in that time). Obviously, this wouldn't take the exact same form as the Holocaust - it would take a new form.

Thom writes: "I don't believe that Blair and Chirac etc are anything other than desperate and power hungry puppets...of what though?"

There has been some suggestion that major world decisions are actually made by a small cabal of the powerful, who congregate in institutions like the Trilateral Commission and the Council of Foriegn Relations. These individuals are also connected to archetypal occult forces, though many of them are not consciously aware of it (some of them may have awareness of this). The Bohemian Grove rituals could be considered an overt manifestation of these agreements. Washington was designed by Free Masons... etc. All of this takes place, for the most part, on an archetypal and symbolic level rather than a literal one.

Thom writes: "Are we witnessing the sorrowful comedy of human frailty or something stranger and more deeply embedded within the evolution of conciousness?"

Both, but more the latter.

If karmic incarnations occur, then it may be the case that they happen on various sides of the equation. Someone like Cheney might be a very old being, one who has fulfilled a similar role on other worlds. In a way, you could consider the Bush crew as "guardians of the threshold." I suspect that their personal "tragedy" is that they end up bringing the result they most hate and fear into reality.

I think there is also a kind of energetic "squeezing" taking place. Gurdjieff was interesting on this point: Humanity on the Earth is meant to transmute cosmic energies through our conscious attention and ritual. He believed that populations were exploding because of the lack of an initiated caste that could transmute these energies, hence more and more people are necessary for less and less of a result, as death releases some psychic energy.

Thom
03-19-2006, 09:41 AM
Makes sense to me - If there are concious choices being made by an elite allied to an 'occult archetype' then we can talk about the existence of the 'illuminati.' I certainly wouldn't rule it out. Its interesting that of my friends, only those who've taken psychedelics think the question is of any value.

Has anyone read Cornelius Castoriadis?

An aquaintance at the protests in Paris today told me there was no riot until the riot police turned up. I thought she was making a semantic witticism, but then I thought about Daniels post, above. The state intentionally provoke violence, and even initiate it, to justify the extreme measures they deploy to keep us safe...

Do the Red Brigades and the Black Bloc actually exist?

Thom
03-19-2006, 10:28 AM
Daniel: "I tend to think that for some of these people, a "Final Solution" type scenario is not out of the question."

Could you expand on this please? What evidence or experiences have led you to entertain this notion?

I agree that as a collective we haven't evolved since the 1930's, so theoretically its possible, as various conflicts since have shown.

I see parallels between our own time and Spain in the 30s. Some people oppose the Junta by joining loosely allied international brigades, others just watch tv, buy ipod or play xbox.

[ March 19, 2006, 12:24 PM: Message edited by: Thom ]