PDA

View Full Version : Computers to be 'oxygen of the future'


gone
03-31-2004, 09:14 AM
Now I'm aware of the tendancy to romanticize people further down the spiral dynamic, but this is crap. We do not need this kind of nonsense. Does anyone here carry 'three or four digital devices' or am I just behind the times?

Computers to be 'oxygen of the future'

By Tracey Logan
BBC Go Digital presenter

By the year 2010, scientists predict we will be immersed in a sea of miniature computers.

Many of us carry three or four digital devices with us, according to Simon Moore of Cambridge University's Computer Laboratory, but soon that figure will be in the hundreds.

"They'll be woven into our clothing as identification markers during manufacture," he said.

"They might tell your washing machine what cycle to use, or monitor bio-signs to alert us to impending illness."

Those predictions came at the launch of the Cambridge-MIT Institute's Pervasive Computing initiative (CMI).

It is part of a transatlantic collaboration between information scientists and engineers at Cambridge University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston.

Intelligent agents

As well as ensuring the health of us and our clothes, those ubiquitous digital devices will, by default, be communicators. They will talk to each other and us, wherever we are.

Hot-desking may have been a big trend in the nineties, but future computer users will be truly nomadic, able to access information everywhere.

We have this joke that we want to make computers as pervasive and as unobtrusive as oxygen
Umar Saif, MIT
The challenge for CMI researchers is to build immersive systems that automatically reconfigure data or voice call connections between the full range of digital devices, without getting cut off.

Keeping such systems secure from unauthorised use and attack, will be crucial, as will be the inclusion of intelligent filters that prevent the system pestering us with trivia.

This became patently clear last year when MIT tested a prototype system which monitored a person's location and, seamlessly, used the best available communications device to reach them.

A cell phone call turned into a video-conference call when the researcher entered his office and back to a cell phone call as he left for his car.

But the embryonic system noticed a problem with the researcher's office computer, according to MIT's Umar Saif.

"You couldn't escape from the system", he told Go Digital. "It would find whatever communications that was available and call you.

"The computer was just trying to be helpful, but it turned into the nightmare scenario because there was no way of shutting the system down".

Accessible information

Such pestering from not-so intelligent computer systems in the future will be a real turn-off for users, according to Lancaster University's Professor of Organisational Psychology, Cary Cooper.

"People already suffer from technological overload and it's our fault because we allow the technology to manage us, not the other way around," he said.

"Some of the problems we have are because technologies are created by engineers trying to think of a really interesting tweak.

"Let the e-mail chase the cell phone if someone's away on business and if we can't get him that way, we'll get him some other way.

"But they should think more about the impact of these developments on our lives."

This is what the CMI researchers will be doing, said Dr Saif.

Ultimately, he said, the issue is not about information overload but making the power of computers more accessible to ordinary people with no special skills and with little money to shell out on the kinds of gadgets we rely on today.

Energy efficient processors running on wireless devices with vastly increased battery time will be essential to the CMI's pervasive computing vision, as will enhancements in computer vision and speech processing.

"We have this joke that we want to make computers as pervasive and as unobtrusive as oxygen", he said.

"We want people to use computers without even realising they're using them."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/technology/3583479.stm

Published: 2004/03/31 08:20:24 GMT

© BBC MMIV

forteanajones
06-18-2004, 10:58 AM
Gelfer, I am totally with you. I laugh and cry when I see guys at work wearing (yes) three or four digital devices, although it's gotten so commonplace in my world I usually forget to. Plus I wear a phone and sometimes a second device myself.

http://www.dansdata.com/gz034.htm

One of my favorite hardware enthusiast writers has done a piece on what may be the next wave of bringing a sort of non-ordinary reality, closer to the external world. As someone who (at Six) was given plastic inserts to wear in my shoes to compensate for defective feet, and glasses to compensate for defective eyes, I have to admit that the prospect of turning my "corrections" into "augmentations" sweetens the burden of wearing technology all the time. Darwin's ghost recedes into the background of the productivity buzz...

While I am troubled by the trend described in the Tracey Logan article, I wonder if it makes sense to strike a balance somewhere since the tools do seem to have such a strong practical side in some cases. But who gets to determine where and how to draw the line?

Rob P
06-18-2004, 06:25 PM
~JUST SAY NO~

It's that simple!!!!!

Seriously- watching (and avoiding) all the
'connected' people on the streets everyday
and seeing how disconnected they
actually are (from themselves, from
the 'real' world in front of their eyes, etc...)
I just have to laugh in amazement!

From the top to the bottom of the economic
food chain- all the haves and have-nots and
wanna- haves look like a bunch of
addicted techno-drug users...
The great equalizer of society is the
little wireless device you stare at in your hand
as if your life depended on it.
And if you think it does, it does....
And so it goes.

Seeya!
Rob

forteanajones
06-18-2004, 07:05 PM
I guess where I'm coming from on that, is that I sense an upcoming revolution in communication and soon enough, I don't think we will need to rely on any of these devices to accomplish what now would appear to be impressive feats of collaboration and networking.

Even the Internet will evolve into something both spiritual and organic. We'll simply do all of this with the human technology we already have. I think the kinds of technology described above can be viewed as a sometimes useful, yet childlike expression of that.

daniel
06-23-2004, 07:52 AM
Much of modern technology is an extraordinarily wasteful attempt to return to the natural telepathy and precognitive attunements that we once had without it.

sire_012
06-23-2004, 07:02 PM
i understand to a certain extent folks aversion to computers, much technology seems like an increasingly obsessive clinging to the material as we drift closer and closer into a different medium of communication. however, i also tend to have a bit of a problem with anybody who demonizes it too much. the internet and computers have assisted our coming to a point in history where we can again communicate beyond the snails pacing of written words and spacial seperation. and really, its not the medium to blame or praise, whatever path is required to get to the desired goal is the appropriate path, in this case we need these little obsessive toys to bring us into the realization of our collective mind. in many ways i see this luddite fear/demonization of computers en route to original communicative states as the same kind of puritanism that plagues people who believe that any spiritual state attained with the assistance of a compound to be invalid.
i'll gladly raise my glass to this wonderful machine that allows me so many truly amazing conveniances, allows me to streamline a great deal of the bullshit in my life and gives me more time to play, to meditate and grants me the ability to communicate with all of you bright and beautiful people.