Errata

[KiloWatts]

Can someone post the contents of the errata insert? I lost it, and have arrived at page 261 to find the first of the errors.

[sidecross]

Originally posted by KiloWatts:
Can someone post the contents of the errata insert? I lost it, and have arrived at page 261 to find the first of the errors.“p. 261: The final line is omitted. The last sentence properly reads: “I suggested the aggrieved women create their own event, with speakers more to their taste; if they did so, I promised I would try to attend. A friendlier back and forth followed this.”

[KiloWatts]

do you have the rest?

[sidecross]

Originally posted by KiloWatts:
do you have the rest?You are welcome; maybe you can ask the rest of the chorus for help.

[KiloWatts]

thank you :cool: smile.gif

[okster]

Here is the complete contents of the insert:

2012 Errata

p 117: The third and fourth lines are intended to read: "According to this hypothesis, Christ 'redeems' us only when we follow his lead."

p. 180: The final line is omitted. The last sentence properly reads: "Cravings and desires are constantly pouring into us through the astral body, and the goal of our present phase of evolution is to master those cravings, and the astral body itself, through the strengthening of the I, transmitting lower passions into higher energies."

p 261: The final line is omitted. The last sentence properly reads, "I suggested the aggrieved women create their own event, with speakers more to their taste; if they did so, I promised I would try to attend. A friendlier back and forth followed this."

p. 264: The first two lines repeat from the bottom of the previous page.

p. 265: The first line is omitted. The first sentence properly reads: "I didn't know what to make of this scene. Despite my interest in the esoteric and occult, I maintained the skepticism of my native New York - a city where money talks
and bullshit walks - and I had litle patience for the sugary sentimentality of the wispy New Age."