PDA

View Full Version : The Aeons of Crowley


Humming
01-24-2005, 09:51 AM
In my writing class we were supposed to bring in a picture of something about describe it, so I brought in a picture of the Aeon (Judgement)trump card from Aleister Crowley's Thoth tarot deck. This is one of the most fascinating cards to my mind, and is deeply involved with Crowley's philosophy. I am working mainly from the Crowley expert Lon Milo DuQuette's new book about the tarot, "Understanding Aleister Crowley's Thoth Tarot" and also with Terence McKenna's visions of history and the Fall into patriarchy in mind. I thought this might be an interesting and useful read, so I'm posting it here.

“Aeon” (Judgement) picture from Thoth Tarot

(A good image of the painting can be found online here:
http://www.kandayata.net/grafix/tarot/toth/20_Das_Aeon.jpg)

This card, 20 (XX) in the trumps of Aleister Crowley and Frieda Harris’ Thoth tarot represents the three aeons of time, which can be understood historically, and related to three Egyptian deities. The painting itself also incorporates surrealism, representing “projective geometry”, sacred geometrical patterns which corresponds with Crowley’s philosophy about the three aeons.

According to Crowley, the first age was the Aeon of Isis, the Great Goddess. This aeon occurred before history, before civilization, when humankind was first developing as a species: living freely as nomadic tribes on the plains of Africa and Egypt. At this time, the feminine aspect was worshipped, the Great Goddess, because of her natural connection to the Earth and ability to give life, which no man could claim. To these early peoples the Goddess was the personification of mystery: she bled for several days each month without dying, and then if the bleeding stopped, her belly would swell up and she would eventually bud and bring another living being into the world. All forms of ritual magic and worship paid homage to this phenomenon of mystery and life. Tribes lived in orgiastic partnership societies where women and men were equal, or sometimes matriarchies where the birth mothers would control the decisions and destiny of the tribe. Eventually, however, the mystery of birth was unraveled as the process of paternity was understood, fathers claimed their children as property, and the mystical divinity of the feminine moon was discarded and forsaken as the patriarchy was established.

The second age was the Aeon of Osiris, the dying god. Habitualized, geographically stable agricultural societies developed and the phallic sun was recognized as the prime giver of life, instead of the feminine Earth. The partnership between women and men was no longer equal, and the backlash against women resulted in the modern crises of sexuality and sexual identity that is still forceful and dominant within our collective psyche to this day. Inherent to this age and this deep schism of spiritual crisis was the belief that the sun was born every day with the dawn, and died at night when it set on the horizon. The elders speculated about whether or not the sun would ever return, or if their crops and livelihood would die with the night. The dreamworld of death became a hellish place of nightmares, anxiety, and fear: the fear of death, not properly understood as a necessary and vital part of life. This disunification was projected in the collective fear about the death of the sun. But, as they watched and waited, it became clear that the sun which seemingly died every twelve hours, would always be reborn in the morning. This phenomenon of death and rebirth became the focus of magical energies, and the pattern of resurrections was codified as a social ritual, and played out in the practice of human sacrifice. Human blood spilled on the fields of crops would act as fertilizer and help the crops to grow. Above all, this ritual gave comfort: as the elders knew for certain that the sun would rise as long as they continued their sacrifices. The priests became very powerful, claiming to interpret the divine will of heaven; it was they who chose who died, and who lived. Eventually, the human sacrifices were replaced with animal’s blood, and then the symbolic offering of wine. Echoes of this early form of self-sacrifice can be seen in many religions today, especially Christianity and the myth of Jesus’ crucifixion.

The third Aeon is the Aeon of Horus, the age in which we live today. The birth of this aeon was marked by Aleister Crowley on March 20th, 1904 in Cairo, Egypt. It signifies a massive shift from the dominant theme of birth, death, and resurrection, to an understanding of life and existence as a continuous and unbroken process: a unitive projection. In the age of Orisis, the sun was worshipped as the divine. In the Aeon of Horus, we realize ourselves as radiantly divine, projecting the same energy and fire which the sun itself exudes to give life and vitality to the world. Like the sun, we do not die. Death, like the time of night before the dawn, is an illusion that has been considered in the past to be a clear division, but the reality is a unity: life is a process of continual growth, a wholeness of existence which is unbroken by death. Death is merely a change of phase from one state to another, and no energy is ever lost.

In Harris’ painting, the three Aeons can be seen eclipsing each other, overlayed and understood as a unity.

[ January 24, 2005, 10:52 AM: Message edited by: Humming ]

Lowlight
01-25-2005, 12:30 AM
Hey humming I bought the deck a few weeks ago but havnt had a chance to use it or even look at it properly yet. i will look for that book you mentioned.

peace

nanouk
01-25-2005, 04:26 AM
i have only used the deck once, they were my friend's and i did a reading for her. they are very easy to read from, as the symbolism is quite 'universal'. i am not an experienced tarot card user at all, and usually frown at pentagrams *lol*, but these did not offend me at all...it would not be my personal choice of deck, but that is irrelevant, for all i care a deck of playing cards work just fine (: inclusive of a Joker, of course! ;0P

Humming
01-25-2005, 05:43 AM
Lowlight, DuQuette's book seems to be the definitive title on Crowley's tarot, although it was only published last year. It's quite thorough and honest and very well written, giving many useful details about the creation of the deck, Harris and Crowley's relationship, and the deep esoteric meanings within the cards. That part about the Aeons in particular I thought was extremely interesting. My interpretation was a bit skewed because I know that Crowley did not actually view women as being equal in some ways, but it seems that his philosophy, at least the letter of it, is saying that women are equal, as radiant beings of energy.

Does anyone know where to go for more information about Crowley's conception of the Aeons?

[ January 25, 2005, 06:44 AM: Message edited by: Humming ]

nanouk
01-25-2005, 07:24 AM
all i know is the referral to the different pole stars, Theban, Sirius and Vega, and the Aquarian age, which is dawning...it is said, that by 2017 we are entering Vega, and the Age of Aquarius...

Agent Smith
01-25-2005, 03:30 PM
duquette's books are delightful. i highly recommend 'my life with spirit', and 'the chicken cabalah'

lvx23
02-01-2005, 06:45 PM
To really get into Crowley's aeonics you need to dive into the Libers. Also read through The Book of Thoth. DuQuette provides a great summary, but to really find personal meaning in Crowley's system you need to dig in and do the work yourself. I recommend Liber Aleph, Vision and the Voice, and Book of Lies. You'll likely find them to be terribly intriguing and frustrating. Pick up the threads that you recognize and then start finding the concordances.

An aside about aeonics: All aeons exist simultaneously. Human consciousness will tend to reflect one over the others at a given time in it's evolution. The aeon of Horus is said to be dominant at this time, while Osiris and Isis are less so. Some say that Maat shares this aeon. Balance.

Humming
02-01-2005, 08:53 PM
I'm reading the Book of Thoth and, as you said, it's remarkably frustrating in some ways.

I will check out those others, thanks for the recommendations.

sire_012
02-09-2005, 04:35 AM
I'm reading the Book of Thoth and, as you said, it's remarkably frustrating in some ways.i'm interested, what are you finding frustrating about it?

i'm not saying it can't be frustrating, but i've also found in the past that when i've struggled with it, or when friends have struggled with it, it was because i/they were expecting more of a littany of terms than an invitation into an artistic relationship, which is ultimately what crowley's approach to the tarot seems to be. for that matter it's also his approach to magick, though i think few people get beyond his endless flogging of organized religions.

if you want, post some of the things that are sticking on you, it would be interesting to play with here. 'toth' is one of crowley's best gifts to western esotericism, i've read and reread it for about 10 years now and i still am blown away upon revisitting it.

paul
02-09-2005, 05:41 PM
sire_012

i totally agree

---------------------------------------------------------------
"nuff said"- stan lee

Humming
02-09-2005, 08:47 PM
Sire, I would say that the language is the most frustrating. It's difficult for me to understand when Crowley is trying to be a poet, when he's trying to be a historian, and when he's trying to be a philosopher, and a magician.

The mythical scope of his literary esoteric knowledge is far beyond mine; I find the "Book of Thoth" to be frustrating simply because I don't know a lot of what he's referencing, although DuQuette's book is remarkably helpful in this.

I know the cards themselves on a personal level just from doing readings with people, but I think it will take me a few years and a few readings of these books to fully get the whole picture of the tarot.

The most interesting aspect to me is how the tarot relates to the Tree of Life. I need to memorize and internalize the Tree of Life so that when I do readings I can relate them to the cards.

This is just one example of what it would take for me to learn them in a complete way, which I will probably do in the next few years.

Sire, what's your experience with the cards, and Crowley's philosophiess?

[ February 09, 2005, 09:48 PM: Message edited by: Humming ]

sire_012
02-11-2005, 07:02 AM
It's difficult for me to understand when Crowley is trying to be a poet, when he's trying to be a historian, and when he's trying to be a philosopher, and a magician.could you post an example?

I know the cards themselves on a personal level just from doing readings with people, but I think it will take me a few years and a few readings of these books to fully get the whole picture of the tarot.-- i might suggest that you will acquire a 'whole' picture of the tarot and the cards that create it about as quickly as you'll get a whole picture of yourself or a person you visit with occasionally. it is not hyperbole to say that these cards are living beings. they will respond to each person differently and will also grow and adapt demanding you to develop a working relationship with them. i could make an argument that all things in this apparent existence contain that level of complexity and vitality and that the tarot allows a slight glimpse into that reality, which is why they are so effective as a mirroring device. but, i'm not going to right now. smile.gif

The most interesting aspect to me is how the tarot relates to the Tree of Life. I need to memorize and internalize the Tree of Life so that when I do readings I can relate them to the cards.or just keep a chart or book next to you while you read. or even better why not make cloth that illustrates the 10 sephiroth and do the spread according to the 10 spheres found in the back of the book? that way you'd have your chart and a nice ritual piece with plenty of mojo in it ready to go. of course this is falling back into a bit of pedanticism, but, at it's most base level, the tree of life is a nice model for compartmentalizing things for greater depth of understanding and why not use it as such?

Sire, what's your experience with the cards, and Crowley's philosophiess?i've been reading tarot cards and other divination systems since i was 11. i've dabbled iwth several forms of ritual magick for quite a while including Crowley's system which, being a raised a Catholic, was fairly alluring at one point both for it's implied queenie flamboyancy and also it's outward attack against christiandom. however, at some point after i started getting all the things my greedy little mind could drum up (and bit of the tennis elbow) i realized how short Thelema falls from fully satisfying the needs i connect most with and how much baggage is wrapped up in crowley and his chest thumping. i think he has brought some incredible insight to the table, but i also find it interesting that most the people i know who at one point found him so interesting have since moved far along and in hindsight find him almost laughable. it's very similar to people i konw who have come out of abusive relationships in a strange way... they always claim they gained something from the experience, but can't figure out for the life of them why they spent so much time with the creep. very similar to some psychedelics, i think his obnoxiousness has the ability to break through some hardened membrane of consciuosness which has grown over most western minds. he helps introduce folks to mysticism who might otherwise have never become turned on, but once that task is fulfilled -the womb water breaking or whatever - he becomes about as useful and alluring as afterbirth.

cheers!

tao_jones
02-19-2005, 02:06 PM
Personally I also like Julia Turk's "Navigator's Tarot". It is very Crowleyesque. In the accompanying book she makes it clear that Crowley is an influence on her, but not the only one. One of the fascinating things about Turk's cards and book (besides the incredible artwork which is obviously Divinely inspired) is that she proposes a whole new system of correspondences between Qabalah and the Tarot - in particular she proposes major changes in how the "paths on the tree of life" correspond to the Major Arcana. Crowley uses the system of correspondences that Eliphas Levi used - as does almost eveyone else (except for the Star - of course).
Anyway - this is my first post since joining and I just wante to say "hey".
- Curt

silentwolf
02-19-2005, 02:30 PM
Thanks for the post, Tao.

I've been reading Tarot for a while and studied ritual magic as well, but I never got into Crowley. I've thumbed through a few of his books, but I personally didn't think any of them were worth the money...there's too much symbolism and not enough of the essence in his works. His system, in my opinion, isn't very practical. Then again, I haven't found many systems presented which are practical, and that's why I wrote the book "Awaken: Theory and Practice for the Aspiring Shaman."

Donald Michael Kraig, author of "Modern Magick: 11 Lessons in the High Magickal Arts" presents High Magick in a very digestible manner. That book is definately worth the money, and it's a must-have for any mystic's library. I found a lot of insight into the essence of KBLH through his works, and he has a really good section on Tarot, both for reading the cards and their correspondences to the Tree of Life.